🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.